Final Protective Fire
Links to some interesting places:
R.J.Rummel's blog
Junk Science Blog and debunking discussion forum.
Pirate Ballerina
Dave Kopel's Home Page
Volokh Conspiracy
Glenn Reynolds' Instapundit
Prof Bainbridge Blog
Clayton Cramer
David Friedman's homepage
Overlawyered.com
Vodka Pundit
Tiki Lounge
Jim Dunnigan's site
Cold Fury
Karl's blog
email to finalprotfire at comcast.net
Note that there is someone sending the KLEZ ( and now SOBIG.F ) virus with forged blogger emails.
I will never send you email with attachments - delete any immediately.
Archives ( hard links ):
August 07
July 07
June 07
May 07
April 07
March 07
February 07
January 07
December 06
November 06
October 06
September 06
August 06
July 06
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05
January 05
December 04
November 04
October 04
September 04
August 04
July 04
June 04
May 04
April 04
March 04
February 04
January 04
December 03
November 03
October 03
September 03
September 03
August 03
July 03
June 03
May 03
April 03
March 03
February 03
January 03
December 02
November 02
October 02
September 02
August 02
July 02
June 02
May 02
Thursday, March 13, 2003
Eugene Volokh repeats something that he and I have previously noted, that the Congressional power to declare war doesn't mean that the resolution must say "we declare war". Hmmm, of course, I doubt that Prof. Volokh has noticed my comments on this matter, I've pointed to his previously. In the post linked above, Prof. Volokh relates this to the recent First Circuit decision. What he doesn't point out, perhaps because he's more polite than I, is that the list of plaintiffs in the caption of the case is a veritable Who's-Who of congressional Democrat losers. The actual opinion is located here and contains a quick trip through the main cases on ripeness and political question doctrines.
Robin 4:09 PM